Burnley FC - The London Clarets

The London Clarets
Match Reports 2003-2004

Home
Magazine - latest issue
Magazine - archive
Fixtures / results
Match reports
News and Comment
News archive
Player of the year
Meetings with Burnley FC
Firmo's view
Pub guide
Survey
Photos
Burnley FC history
London Clarets history
About this site
Credits
Site map
Site search
Contacts
E-mail us

 

 

Match reporter Firmo Can’t seem to get off the ground today
Naardge 2 Burnley 0
Report by Firmo

It’s in the lot of the occasional match reporter that every so often one gets handed a game like this: a match in which not much happened, where Burnley were second best and the better team on the day won. This was one of those quickly forgotten defeats. None of which makes for a very good match report.

Another factor was that your match reporter watched the game not from the away end but from the unusual perspective of the posh hospitality seats. A few of us decided to forsake the away bench – a curious straggle of seats along the touchline, behind which what looks to be a decent-sized new stand is thankfully taking shape – in favour of comfort and a superior view. It’s not something I’d make a habit of doing but it was an interesting one-off treat. It has to be said that the Norwich hospitality experience was excellent and the food as first rate as you’d expect with Delia at the helm. There was a downside. Our fellow spectators were not the most passionate or best informed, and a thick pane of glass came between the game and me. This effectively insulated us from much of the crowd noise, the PA announcements and even the referee’s whistle. It’s amazing what a difference it makes when you can’t hear the ref blow. Plus, I’d probably better add, I watched the match through a warm, thick haze of alcohol. To accompany the fine food a river of red wine freely flowed. (Merlot rather than Claret, come to think of it – how did that happen?) A nice nap in a comfy bed was probably a more sensible bet than trying to keep track of a football match. It all meant my concentration on the spectacle was not at its most pinpoint. Thus – and I’ll have to admit this because I’m not going to get away with it – in the second half I found myself calling for Ian Moore’s introduction only for it to be gently pointed out that he’d been on the pitch for the last ten minutes. (In fairness, it should be said he hadn’t done anything to make me notice him.)

In truth, booze had played a more significant part in the weekend than the match. Not for the first time, an advanced London Clarets squad decided to make absolutely sure we didn’t miss the kick off by arriving in town on Friday evening. A jolly fine time was had in some of the many excellent pubs of this most welcoming of towns. I do like Norwich. It was a beautifully sunny day and we were all set for the cracking game of football that we never got. Come to think of it, I was glad I’d had a decent drink at least, as the match didn’t supply much excitement. This was a return to the old days of a fine time out spoiled only by the game.

If we really must talk about the match, we lined up unchanged from the fine win at Stoke, with the returning Roche being the only adjustment on the bench (for O’Neill). It quickly became apparent, however, that we were not to play with the same swagger as in Stoke. It has to be said that Norwich are a rather different proposition to Stoke, in that they are actually any good. Nigel Worthington has built a decent side and although their start to the season has been indifferent, they’re the sort of team that will be looking to reach the play-offs. Plus of course the law of sod that always operates in relation to Burnley decreed that their three new loan signings would arrive when we were due to play there.

Peter Crouch has already become a stalwart of that great list of Players Who Always Score Against Us. We look set to have an interesting relationship with Crouch over the course of his career. I predict we’ll attempt to sign him another six or seven times before he retires, but he’ll keep moving elsewhere and scoring against us. He’s a funny looking bloke but he’s no Kevin Francis, and he has a decent touch. Alongside him was Huckerby, a player who has led a curiously rootless existence given his early promise, but one who’ll always prosper at this level. The match therefore shaped up to be a contest between our newly acquired central defence and Norwich’s two on-loan strikers.

As it happens, Maysy and Toddy did mostly alright. These are difficult opponents to handle. Crouch did win a number of headers, but then, you’d expect that, and his problem seemed to be that, being so tall, he couldn’t keep the ball down. It was further forward that we struggled. Our key creative players, Blake and Chadwick, were subdued, and never got fully into the game. The other three midfielders were quiet, and up front Facey had another disappointing game. He works hard, but so far he hasn’t looked like a striker. He doesn’t look a central player, and he doesn’t look like he’s going to solve our scoring problems. It’s hard to believe he’s going to score when he gets the ball, and he missed what was probably our best chance shortly before half time when he put well over the bar from a good position.

By then, Norwich had had a few flashes but nothing terribly clear cut, with The Beast proving equal to the task. We also had a shout for a penalty from a foul on Chadwick. Ternent was adamant about this afterwards, but from my view at the other end, it was impossible to tell.

So a half short on incident drew to a close, causing little excitement to stir the soporific occupants of the posh seats. As at Stoke, there’d been plenty of decent passing – this time on both sides – but matched with a conspicuous lack of creativity. We hadn’t found the final ball, and Norwich had clearly had the better half. For us, without a goal-getter on show, this was clearly going to be 0-0 or nothing. Thus the interval score was met with relief by the small Clarets contingent behind the glass and disappointment by everyone else. Looking on the bright side, we had a bit more wine that we hadn’t finished before kick-off put by.

The second half saw us substitute the apparently injured West for the evidently not fit Roche. This was hardly going to supply the inspiration we needed. Norwich came out the brighter and we needed The Beast to keep us in it. Then Todd, otherwise having a good game, cocked up a sloppy defensive clearance and the ball bounced to Crouch. He had only Jensen to beat and proved he’s more than a big lad by placing an accurate shot into the bottom corner.

Game over, as we failed to respond by creating a single clear cut chance. I don’t recall Robert Green in the Norwich goal exactly having a save to make at any point. Ian Moore was apparently introduced around this time and joined in the team’s subdued mood. Remember his good form of pre-season?

We were pushing forward and trying to get an equaliser – without quite looking like we were going to do it – when Norwich scored the clinching second on the break. While we were in pursuit of the perfect chance, rather than getting a shot in, the ball broke to Huckerby, who charged down the other end. It had been most unlike substitute Iwan Roberts not to score against us, so he promptly put that right, burying Huckerby’s precise cross in virtually the last move of the match. Final whistle, and straight out of the hospitality section before we made it any more obvious we weren’t celebrating the result.

So what conclusions can we draw? (Other than don’t let Dermot order the wine in future.) Where we are now is probably about where we deserve to be. I suspect we’re a mid-table side at the moment. We’re better than Gillingham and Stoke, but not as good as West Brom and Norwich. Come May, of course, mid table would be mission accomplished. After a poor start to the season, we’ve taken steps to sort the defence out, and we give fewer soft goals away, so that’s one thing. The passing has improved, and is now often of a high standard, so that’s another thing in our favour. From a low starting point, some progress has been made.

The problem at the moment is in turning possession into chances and in getting shots on target. If Facey doesn’t work out soon then we’ll need to come up with something else. We need someone bursting into the box, someone to cross to. As a side we seem shot-shy and we need to start getting in more shots and making the opposition keeper work harder. It seems to take us a lot of possession to generate a chance.

It would have been nice to have had to worry a bit more in that hospitality section about what we would do if Burnley scored a goal. As it was, we were given scant opportunity to rise from our comfy, expensive seats.


Team: Jensen, West (Roche, 45), Todd, May, Camara, Chadwick, Farrelly, Grant, Blake, Branch (Ian Moore, 64), Facey.

Subs not used: Weller, Alan Moore, Chaplow.

Scorers: Crouch 58, Roberts 90.

Referee: Clive Penton (Woodindean).

Attendance: 16,407.

Firmo's man of the match: The Beast.

"As with all articles on the site, the views expressed in the match reports section are those of the individual contributor, and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Burnley FC London Supporters Club."

Back Top Home E-mail us

The London Clarets
The Burnley FC London Supporters Club