Burnley FC - The London Clarets

The London Clarets
Match Reports 1998-1999

Home
Magazine - latest issue
Magazine - archive
Fixtures / results
Match reports
News
News archive
Player of the year
Meetings with Burnley FC
Firmo's view
Pub guide
Survey
Photos
Burnley FC history
London Clarets history
About this site
Credits
Site map
Site search
Contacts
E-mail us

 

 

A pragmatic affair
Burnley 1 Blackpool, 28th November 1998
Firm
o

This was much better. While the performance still left a lot to be desired, after the ravages of the games before, the result meant everything. Long after the memory of a dull game between two sides short on form has faded, the satisfaction of stopping a suicidal plunge down the table will linger.

The game was low in chances. Neither keeper had a save to make in the first half. Blackpool demonstrated an unearthly ability to kick the ball out of play at every opportunity, occasionally sending it splashing into the muddy water collected in front of the Beehole. It is, thankfully, some years since I’ve visited Bloomfield Tip (I thought asking money to stand there was taking the piss, frankly), so my memory may be deficient, but can it be that their pitch is much larger than ours? As they found the touchline with unerring accuracy, this was one explanation that sprung to mind. Another was that, as they were also playing with lots of defenders, they were short of confidence and had come here for a draw.

They didn’t look anything special. Neither did we. Yet, after Bournemouth, this ordinariness was nirvana. Little, clearly not fit, later revealed to be playing through an injury which would rob us of his godlike services for at least a month afterwards, still looked like our one source of attacking initiative. Blackpool kindly consented not to mark him, which was an interesting tactical decision on the part of their manager.

Ours had one or two to make, and this time seemed to get it about right. With Armstrong pulled fifteen minutes before kick-off, Heywood was handed the number eleven shirt and coped as best as he could, basically concentrating on getting out of harm’s way. Reid looked injured and was haphazard, and O’Kane too was unfit and struggling, but then, even when fit he still struggles. He went off at half time to be replaced by Eastwood, who can "play anywhere." With Little finding the going heavy, our attacking options were always going to be limited, so there was never a goal-fest on the cards. Payton at least looked interested, which placed him ahead of Cooke, but it was hard to judge either of our chance-starved strikers. Matt Hewlett, graciously loaned to us by Bristol City so he can get fit for them at our expense, looked, surprisingly, unfit. That we can forgive, but he also looked lightweight and lazy. In other words, he was pretty much like every other pointless loan signing who drifts in and out of the club without ever raising much interest.

There were positives, however. Both Ford and Robertson, two players I confess to disliking, had their best games I’ve seen. They both worked hard and showed signs of aggression. Robertson got up and down well. Brass was outstanding in central defence, enjoying easily his finest hour so far in that difficult position. He held the line, kept things organised and avoided the spread of the panic which has proved our undoing in recent games. Sat behind the goal, what impressed me most was his rapport with Crichton and the way they communicated. I know one should ideally be able to take this for granted, but it hasn’t always been so in the past. They divided up responsibility for balls and ran the show between them. This helped compensate for the embarrassing spectacle of what we assumed was the reserve goalie warming up at half time, and looking less than convincing. When the team ran out for the second half, he turned round, and we saw the number one on his back, observed him taking his position in the goal and realised this was our first choice keeper. That he had to practice at half time says something about the lack of action, I suppose.

The one moment on which the game hinged came after 67 minutes, when Payton got into the box, fell over and was gifted a penalty. It would be fair to say that this award was dubious. However, we were due one to us, and it still wasn’t half as dodgy as some of the decisions given against us of late. It would take a few of these to compensate for the awful hash the referee made at Chesterfield, for example.

Payton picked himself up, took it, hit it low into the corner, hard, and scored.

After that, Crichton went on to impress us with his bravery /stupidity in snapping up every ball that came into his box. He clearly isn’t concerned about the risk of getting hurt. He’ll be a decent enough keeper, a reasonable shot-stopper, and every so often he’ll drop a clanger. We’ve had worse.

They had a spell of pressure towards the end, but nothing too threatening. Ford undid much of his earlier good work when he went for a header on the edge of our area but missed it completely, causing a momentary feeling that we might blow it yet. Their bastards reject Ormerod was sufficiently, er, "competitive" to allow us to call him, well, a bastards reject, providing one of the day’s few sustained chants. And we were a bit worried when Junior Bent came on towards the end. There was a collective intake of breath. We knew he was useful. He was taking on Eastwood. It could have been nasty, and if he’d scored we would have found it easy to be wise after the event, but after one early scare where he left his man for dead, he faded, and Eastwood did a decent enough job of sticking near him.

For all that some people complained, we’ve had worse games than this. This was the kind of low-entertainment, bog-standard fare that gets thrown up every season, good or bad. These games happen. The crucial thing is to win them 1-0 rather than lose 1-0. At the moment, we can only take a pragmatic approach: this was better than getting beat, now let’s keep doing the same and see if we can manage without Glen Little. When he returns, perhaps they can start giving us something to get excited about.

There was no passing to speak off, but both sides looked equally inept. The defence focused on clearing the ball, while the midfield got through some work and set their minds on the job in hand. We didn’t lose concentration at the end, either. All this is an improvement. Of course, it only represents a satisfactory state of affairs if it is built on in the future.

As I sat behind the goal, with the clear winter day turning dark and cold, I felt reasonably satisfied. It was a start.

Team: Crichton, Robertson (Scott 88), O’Kane (Eastwood 45), Ford, Brass, Reid, Little, Hewlett, Cooke, Payton, Heywood. SNU: Maylett.

The away match

Back Top Home E-mail us

The London Clarets
The Burnley FC London Supporters Club