Burnley FC - The London Clarets

The London Clarets
Match Reports 1999-2000

Home
Magazine - latest issue
Magazine - archive
Fixtures / results
Match reports
News
News archive
Player of the year
Meetings with Burnley FC
Firmo's view
Pub guide
Survey
Photos
Burnley FC history
London Clarets history
About this site
Credits
Site map
Site search
Contacts
E-mail us

 

 

Charity begins at home
Burnley 2 Bury 2
, 25 March 2000
Firmo

Everything about the morning screamed to turn back and go home. All omens were against me. At six thirty I was cleaning my glasses when I broke them. This sparked an increasingly desperate hunt for the spare pair, naturally hindered by the fact that I couldn't see anything. My wife had to get out of bed and dig them out of a dusty drawer. Immediate Brownie Point loss, plus what kind of portent was this? I was already trying to cope with the consequences of the Night Before. I should have learned from Bournemouth that it is ill-advised to visit a beer festival the night before a Burnley game. Then there was the ankle. The Night Before, charging at top speed towards said beer festival, I'd gone over on my weak right ankle yet again, and walking was still a slow and very painful affair. Spare glasses giving weird perspective, my eyes telling me the ground was slanted, my feet telling me it was flat, I hobbled to the nearest tube station that hasn't been closed down yet. Crossing the road was scary too. Distances couldn't be trusted. Eventually I arrived at Euston to learn that no trains were leaving. Emergency work. Still, we made it to Preston merely forty minutes late. It's been worse. And yet I pressed on. I would not abandon my plan. I haven't seen enough home games. Since New Year, I'd only caught the stirring win over Bristol Rovers and deflating defeat against Preston. With options dwindling, I just wanted to see a standard home game that we could expect to win. After all, we would win, wouldn't we? We'd recovered well from that 4-2 capitulation at Gigg Lane. Tables don't lie at this stage. We were clearly the better side. While stuttering somewhat lately, this was a game a side seeking promotion, albeit by a dubious route, should win.

Ah well, the portents were right. A 6am warm bed would have been the sensible choice. As if determined to prove that there are mysterious forces shaping our life on this earth, Burnley duly served up a defensive crapfest straight out of the old days.

For some weeks now, in response to my concerns about the way we were playing, people have told me that at this stage of the season, it's all about results. Forget the performance. The points are everything. To some extent, I can sympathise with that view. A steady accumulation of the eightyish points required to guarantee a place in the play-offs would be an unanswerable justification for any number of unconvincing displays. True, we might have cause to wonder about whether we're going to improve once that new competition starts, but we'd worry about that if it happens. Only we haven't been steadily collecting the points. We've consistently started to drop them. You can't win every game, but two out of three of the recent matches against Luton, Blackpool and Bury should have yielded wins. Against this, only the point at Gillingham was an unexpected bonus. Each slip up puts pressure on the next fixture.

And, to turn the argument round, I'd worry less if we'd played well and not won. That would give me hope that they next week we could play well and get a better result. But here, we played badly. A number of individual players put in bad performances. As a team, we did not pass to each other, did not play the ball on the floor and did not take shots at goal. Our tactics were mistaken, our team selection misguided and our substitutions ill thought through. Of course, this is not what the official version will say. That will point to Andy Payton's second 'goal', a cool finish from a perfectly weighted Little ball, ruled out for at best a close offside. They might record that the free kick from which Bury scored their second should not have been given. The late shot that Jepson leathered off the post might be mentioned. Ternent could well bring together these disparate threads to weave a beautiful excuse. But for anyone who saw the game, it would still seem pretty threadbare. Burnley played badly, went ahead, tried to defend and got caught. We've been saying all season that sooner or later we would come unstuck defending a 1-0 lead, and this was the day it finally came about. In passing, you may wonder why we set out to defend a 1-0 lead at home to a side half a division lower anyway?

We did not win this game because we were insufficiently committed to attack. We were not brave enough or positive enough. We did not seize the initiative. And, given that we do not actually have a midfield - I consider this to be a fact so firmly established that I do not need to spend any more time demonstrating it - sitting on a lead is never going to be the easiest or most sensible option.

As for the actual details of the match, the first half contained nothing worth noting. After Blackpool, Ternent had performed his usual no choice shuffle, dropping Mellon for Mullin. Otherwise it was unchanged. As it happened, Mullin was one of our few bright players, running, getting involved and instigating the odd attack. Thomas charged forward a lot too. With no Bury player in his way, he had little defensive work to perform and nothing to stop him bombing forward. Nothing wrong with this, although with all the respect our Mitchell isn't the man you'd most want to see leading an attack. I hoped for a change of tactics which would swap defenders and leave Davis the spare man, but it did not come. Otherwise, except for Cox and Davis looking authoritative at the back, the half was stand to stand mediocrity.

Half time under the Harry Potts Longside stand was marked by a lot of raised eyebrows and muttered 'oh dears'. No one could mistake Burnley for a branch of the entertainment business.

We got the goal which should have been the breakthrough early into the second half. It was a move which summed up what we are capable of. Glen Little took the ball wide down the right. His brilliant change of direction flat footed the defenders. As they ran the wrong way, he popped a cross onto Payton's head. Payton still had work to do, with a defender and goalkeeper close by, but no one can finish like him. It was a perfect way to celebrate his new contract, a reminder that no one else in the team can score the goals he does, without which we'd be at best nowhere.

A side with verve and fire in its belly would now have gone on to put Bury to the sword. They should have been routinely and clinically despatched. A month or so they would have been, but we make hard work of it now. Instead of finishing the job, we sat back, giving them every encouragement to come at us.

That we were defending was emphasised by the substitutions. Paul Cook needed to be taken off, but bringing on Jepson in his place was a signal that we were hanging on to what we had. It seemed very early to bring him on, but this has become the pattern when we’re in front. And if it means that Cook comes off earlier, then for that we should be thankful, although it doesn’t help us get closer to solving the question of how Cook continues to hang onto his starting place. To watch him now is painful. He’s always been not the team's fittest player and has tended to hang deep, but earlier on he was making up for it with quick thinking and the ability to hit a telling pass. I rated him one of our best in the first months of the season. Now he has completely lost his way. Only a minimal physical presence is required to put him off his game, he has lost the range of his passing and if he played any deeper he would actually have to sit in the stand behind the goal, although that might be to his liking. I suspect Cook himself knows that he is not currently up to the demands of the game, and is therefore doing what any sensible pro would: trying to stay out of trouble and get through the game. But at this stage of the season, we cannot carry passengers. The team is everything, and if someone isn’t pulling their weight, they need leaving out. I feel sorry for Cook, as I know he’s capable of being a good player, but for the last couple of months he has not justified a place. But then, what options do we have? Our failure to improve this section of the squad before transfer deadline day was perplexing. Apparently either Michael Thomas or Nicky Daws might have signed. This could cost us dear.

Not that Cook was the only passenger. His near namesake, Andy Cooke, had a terrible game. People are starting to lose patience with Cooke. Two years ago he scored twenty goals in a worse side. He should have progressed. Instead he seems to have gone backwards. I appreciate that he works hard, but in this game his failings were obvious and without mitigation. He didn’t get anywhere near goal. What summed it up for me a chance he had for a header. Instead of hitting the target, he put in tamely across goal in the hope that someone else would finish. A striker of true quality would have tried to score. In the second half he was reduced to looking for free kicks. I think this has been a crunch season for Cooke, and he has been found wanting. Whatever his other attributes, the job of a striker is to score goals, and he hasn't. In a reasonably successful team, he should now be on target for twenty goals. Less than half that isn’t good enough. When he was taken off, I felt it was the right thing to do. Still, bringing on Mellon? What could Ternent possibly imagine this lightweight would do? It would have been more honest to play the rest of the game with ten men.

Other unacceptable performances came from Branch, Johnrose and Crichton. Actually, I felt Branch didn’t have a bad first half, but sooner or later the opposition sussed out, as they always do, that he is vulnerable if someone runs at him. Adrian Littlejohn, coming on to predictable boos, did just that. In his defence, people tell me that he is an attacking player rather than a defender, so we should make allowances. I still have my doubts. A player with true attacking instincts would have tried a shot when given clear sight of goal from the edge of the area. He ran the ball away in the other direction. As for Johnrose, he is not a footballer. For all his headless chicken running and occasionally effective lunging, there should not be a place in the team for someone who cannot pass the ball. People rate him because he runs around, and sometimes this means he’s in the right place. It comes to something when this is considered good enough. As for Crichton, we’ve said before that he’s a competent saver but doesn't keep goal in a complete sense. A good goalkeeper can run the defence. Crichton a couple of times got into mix-ups when no one called. I still get the impression that the defenders don't trust him. Daft clearances and balls out for corners seem to be preferred to letting Crichton deal with it.

I don’t think that a side playing Burnley could bring on two more ominous substitutes than Littlejohn and Paul Barnes. Barney, an excellent striker for Burnley, received generous applause, and promptly had a hand in their equaliser. No one stopped his run, no one intercepted the passes and the finish was easy enough. The score was suddenly 1-1, and we’d made our defensive substitutions.

Ternent promptly shot from the bench to encourage the troops. Couldn’t he have done this when we were 1-0 up?

Things threatened to get really silly when they went ahead. We were busy feeling disappointed about the draw when the aforementioned Daws took their free kick. In the absence of anything we might reasonably call a defensive wall and with Crichton leaving generous amounts of space in the middle of the goal, Daws placed a training ground shot into the big empty space.

Perhaps this was an undeserved lead. But it has to be said, for all the roughhousing and cynicism we had expected - elbows all over the shop and timewasting at 1-1 from their goalie all the way through to Preece - Bury had played more controlled football than us as the half went on. We were the ones belting it forward, chasing punts and playing head tennis. They were the ones passing it to each other and using the ground.

Fortunately, Bury then stopped playing, and we decided to try to make a go of it. We must have had more goal attempts in the last few minutes than the rest of the game. Jepson was the unlikely hero. He’d looked quite sharp pushed up alongside Payton, and he got his head to one at the corner with just enough force to send it in. Jeppo clearly enjoys scoring late goals against Bury. And although it gave us something to cheer at the end of a pretty miserable afternoon, having flirting with disaster and sort of got away with it, there were few people cheering at the end. This was a bad result and two points dropped, and most people knew it.

I expect that, stuttering though our recent form is, we should still make the play-offs. The difference is, we could have been the side that other teams feared. We could have charged in there confidently, but now we have the look of a team that’s hanging on a bit. Our home form has become nothing special. Sides might have feared to come to Turf Moor, but now after a month where we won one, drew one, lost two there, sides know they can turn up, unsettle us early and at least get a draw. And it is so frustrating, because I still believe that with a little more ambition, one or two additions to the squad and a commitment to more expansive football, we could have missed out on the play-offs for the right reason. A few weeks ago, after our win at Bournemouth, and again after Colchester, I had a feeling we could be the side looking over the shoulders of the top two, the ominous side coming up on the rails ready to take advantage of any loss of form. What really annoys now is that, with Bristol Rovers faltering, it is not us who are going to take advantage. We must re-set our sights lower. The only two sides that matter to us now must be Notts County and Stoke, because if we finish with more points than them we will be in the play-offs. Our small loss of form has forced us into some mental about-turns. If Millwall play Notts County, for example, the good result for Burnley is a Millwall win. It isn’t about catching the sides at the top any more. It’s about not being caught by the sides below. And this is frustrating, but it’s the reality. It’s about being sixth on May the 6th. After that, who knows?

On a personal note, Daws’ goal was the last cock-up of the day. I got home in one piece, full of good beer and an excellent Zagros kebab. The Branson train even arrived ‘early’, having not used up all of its generous pick-up time. So, in the end, I suppose it was only Burnley I couldn’t rely on after all. What’s new?

Team: Crichton, Thomas, Davis, Cox, Branch, Little, Johnrose, Cook (Jepson 67), Mullin, Cooke (Mellon 76), Payton. Subs not used: Armstrong, Smith, West.

The away game

Back Top Home E-mail us

The London Clarets
The Burnley FC London Supporters Club